Genocide: Is "Never Again" Never Correct?
With the 99th
anniversary of the Armenian genocide commemoration less than a month away let
us look at whether mankind has learnt from one of the most brutal forms of
crimes against humanity.
The turn of the millennium marked the end of a truly
bloody and horrific 20th century, with attempts of mass extermination in Asia
Minor and the Middle East, south-east Asia and even at the EU’s doorstep. From
the Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks at the start of the 20th century
to to the Tutsis in Rwanda and the Bosnians in ex-Yugoslavia. International courts have been set up to deal
with these particular types of crime in order to make sure that these never happen
again, but is this enough to ensure that genocide remains confined to history?
As mass murder continues to this day in the Darfur
region, mistreatment of minorities still occurs in modern day Turkey and
persecutions of Roma people remains all too topical in Europe, the answer sadly
appears to be no. In a distressing pattern, the unpunished crimes of the
past century have given others incentive to believe that they will get away
with acts against humanity. At the risk of exhausting an already much quoted
phrase, Hitler once said “Who after all speaks today of the annihilation of the
Armenians?" (Hitler, August 22nd, 1939).
Unaccounted crimes – a threat
to regional security
The fact that the first genocide of the 20th
century still remains unpunished and unaccounted for, not only acts as a threat
for regional security in concerned areas it also encourages political
whitewashing. The Yugoslavian conflict is a clear reminder as to what happens
when whitewashing occurs – the Croatians long denied atrocities against Serbs
in past Balkan Wars creating a hostile environment which reached its climax in
the 90s. In contrast, the German example highlights how recognition and
apologies for past crimes can lead to healthy diplomatic relations with
neighbouring countries and previous victims.
With regards to
Turkey, the current instability in the region makes deniability of past
attempts of mass extinction all the more worrying. Yet nowadays, people are
imprisoned or exiled for speaking out against the country’s past crimes,
bad-mouthing Ataturk can be highly punishable, and Turkey’s slate is far from
clean when it comes to the treatment of minorities today. More shocking is
Rwanda’s Hutus not being held accountable for their brutal slaughter of the
Tutsis and returning to live alongside them, resulting in cases of Tutsis having
the murderer of a family member or friend as a neighbour! Rwanda is a tough
reminder of the absurdness of colonial-based borders, and a clear demonstration
that the creation of a new state (or several) does not necessarily happen following
genocide. Nor is it the solution for
ethnic conflicts as the ongoing violence following the partition of Sudan
illustrates.
It is foolish to think that whitewashing and the brushing
aside of crimes against humanity is something that is strictly bound to the 3rd
world or less economically developed regions. Europe’s current treatment of the
Roma gipsy (ghettoization, persecution – sometimes violent) which eerily
resembles that of the Jews prior to the Holocaust, brings back the sad reality
that we have learnt little to nothing from the past.
The failure of the Genocide
Convention

A New Dawn?
On the 9th of July 2011, when South Sudan
officially proclaimed its independence, Barrack Obama declared that “today is a
reminder that after the darkness of war, the light of a new dawn is possible”. As
much as this new dawn is possible it has not been achieved.
The war is still raging in South Sudan and every time
ethnic cleansing goes unpunished the words “never again” bare less and less
meaning. Genocide Watch’s 2012 report identifies nine countries whose people
are at risk of extermination (stage 7) and 11 countries which are at the
‘preparation’ level of a potential genocide (stage 6). These are unsurprising
figures if we consider the amount of impunity instigators of genocide such as
Pol Pot and Idi Amin have had. Also unsurprising is the ignorance of many
concerning the existence of such crimes, even when it is part of their own
history. Ataturk is a figure of much respect and admiration in Turkey and Mao Tse-Tung
still enjoys a god-like status in China even though he is considered as one of
the biggest murderers of the 20th century.
Genocide Watch also reminds us that stage 8, denial,
is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. Given this fact
it is hard to envisage genocide not happening again and disappearing completely
within the next decade or even century.
For further information
“Screamers
(of genocide)”, featuring System of a Down – a critically acclaimed
documentary explaining why genocide keeps occurring
"The Devil Came On Horseback" - award-winning film film on Darfur
Comments
Post a Comment